From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 12 09:19:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 088C916A4CF; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:19:26 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:19:26 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Jeremy Messenger Message-ID: <20050412091925.GA5811@FreeBSD.org> References: <200504110331.j3B3VU4K018005@repoman.freebsd.org> <425ACC73.4070804@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org cc: Doug Barton cc: Adam Weinberger cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/xbindkeys_config Makefile ports/x11/xbindkeys_config/files patch-gtk2 X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:19:26 -0000 On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 02:23:06PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:13:55 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > >Adam Weinberger wrote: > >>adamw 2005-04-11 03:31:30 UTC > > > >> Seriously. It's time that everything that uses GTK1 by default > >> to move away from it. > > > >Why? > > GTK1 is unmaintain and unsupport for years by the GTK developers. Also, > there are more and more apps that are already move to GTK2. Still, GTK1 is pretty mature and stable technology. There are still quite a few useful apps that happily use it (xmms, titano, etc). While I agree that if some application supports both GTK1 and 2, the second should be made the default, we are not ready from ditching GTK1 completely. After all, they can happily coexist together, and this setup is immune to Qt2/3 issue, AFAICT. ./danfe