Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 12:32:39 -0500 From: "Ross Potts" <rpotts@med.osd.mil> To: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@americantv.com> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -RELEASE and -STABLE Message-ID: <9802111232.ZM8351@unknown.zmail.host> In-Reply-To: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@americantv.com> "Re: -RELEASE and -STABLE" (Feb 11, 10:42am) References: <9802111033.ZM6999@unknown.zmail.host> <19980211104224.13352@right.PCS>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Periodically, the code in -stable is put on a CD, at which time >it is called a -release. As you mentioned above, -release tends to need >patches, simply because Oh, I think I get it now. -RELEASE is a result of all the -STABLE versions to a certain time period. Is that a correct assumption? -- UNIX Rules!!! Ross Potts Internet : Ross.Potts@med.osd.mil EDS-D/SIDDOMS Phone : (703) 824-7601 Skyline Two, Suite 1200 Beeper : 5203 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9802111232.ZM8351>