From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 14 19:26:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0738F16A4CE for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:26:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2D5643D1F for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:26:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adamw@magnesium.net) Received: (qmail 6413 invoked by uid 1252); 15 Mar 2004 03:26:10 -0000 Date: 14 Mar 2004 22:26:10 -0500 Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 22:26:10 -0500 From: Adam Weinberger To: Robin Schoonover Message-ID: <20040315032610.GK16268@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <40511777.5010601@ciam.ru> <20040315024008.GI16268@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040315025627.359E843D48@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040315025627.359E843D48@mx1.FreeBSD.org> X-Editor: Vim 6.2 http://www.vim.org X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5 http://www.mutt.org X-URL: http://www.vectors.cx X-ASL: 6/m/behind you User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: Sergey Matveychuk cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INDEX vs. INDEX-5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 03:26:11 -0000 >> (03.14.2004 @ 2156 PST): Robin Schoonover said, in 1.0K: << > On 14 Mar 2004 21:40:08 -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > >> (03.11.2004 @ 2050 PST): Sergey Matveychuk said, in 0.4K: << > > > May be the question is silly but why we have both INDEX and INDEX-5? > > > > > > I've found no ways to place 5.x-only port into INDEX-5. > > > > > > What is difference to build INDEX on 4.x machine and INDEX-5 on 5.x? > > > The ports tree is the same anyway. > > > > > > > Check the archives. This was answered less than a week ago. > > > > And the question was asked by the same person (with the same message, > but different message ids and different dates). Apparently the OP > has some weird duplication issues going on. >> end of "Re: INDEX vs. INDEX-5" from Robin Schoonover << Aack! That'll teach me to check archives before posting ::P # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@gnome.org \\oo// adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx \\// adamw@magnesium.net http://www.vectors.cx