From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 10 18:29:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FF098B4 for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 18:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22b.google.com (mail-we0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29ADFC23 for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 18:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id w62so5182316wes.2 for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 11:29:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=6/PYsM1kHa4bC6d1sdHExnm4UWs8Kn6jHzCa76YVTso=; b=GIFAgA/ss9Y/v9leBfySP7zRaVotF5nSHIzBblw7xgUav+YMyQP5vTiX2qXcwHs+qz 6h/VGLj500EyoUx4Wksu/zBed6Vd+SOQ+HrZxiN0BsQf0PIIPJKoTeDf50ZAImUgEilq l/q/5qc0/X2SAImbXbYDj2A2AhyI3vJ0SxQ51hDKLZClMffHA7/ycuVmEMP/PwUPNELl Ic030kKuYh++Ru97QfR2dI1kONbMigxQgmksy8ADQOv6DEFaFDAQSdJJvwiEjgLpaqyA wBixYPHp6k36wGKwiqIJ2yRwxJbU43Tj3bLy7etLUu7yVUeG2O+yXXAKV7YSCjzlU0Vp k5fA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.90.51 with SMTP id bt19mr8641353wib.22.1399746559392; Sat, 10 May 2014 11:29:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.48.81 with HTTP; Sat, 10 May 2014 11:29:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <536E4791.9070602@bayofrum.net> References: <536E4791.9070602@bayofrum.net> Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 00:29:19 +0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Force Dependent ports OPTIONS From: Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623l20@gmail.com> To: Chris Rees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18 Cc: FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 18:29:21 -0000 Hi Crees, Thanks. Let me dig a new solution. BR, Muhammad On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > Hi Muhammad, > > On 04/05/2014 15:09, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote: > > Hi Dirk, > > > > How can I enforce it from inside a ports Makefile? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Short answer, you can't, sorry. > > You'll need to test it somehow in a target; > > pre-configure: > if ! openssl --help 2>&1 | grep -q 3779; then \ > ${ECHO_MSG} "openssl was compiled without RFC3779 option; > "; \ > ${ECHO_MSG} "please reinstall with RFC3779 selected"; \ > ${FALSE}; \ > fi > > Not sure if anyone else has a better idea.... > > By the way, check that openssl --help actually tells you whether or > not RFC3779 was compiled, because I don't know :) > > Chris > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > >