From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May  4 05:40:18 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8037B16A404
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  4 May 2006 05:40:18 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDC543D48
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  4 May 2006 05:40:17 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k445eHgL031522
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Thu, 4 May 2006 05:40:17 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k445eHpt031521;
	Thu, 4 May 2006 05:40:17 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 05:40:17 GMT
Message-Id: <200605040540.k445eHpt031521@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/95977
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 05:40:18 -0000

The following reply was made to PR kern/95977; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To: Cheng-Lung Sung <clsung@freebsd.org>
Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/95977
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 09:37:47 +0400 (MSD)

 [...]
 >  Hi,
 >
 >      I knew that. So is that reasonable to let users easily find
 >      themselves jailed or not?
 
 I think yes, by design.  You see, there are no reasons to hide the
 sysctl invented exactly for that and in the same time leave several
 other methods to guess about jail.
 
 Moreover, security.jail.jailed is already used by at least one startup
 script and allows to re-use the same code for the system and jail
 startup.
 
 -- 
 Maxim Konovalov