From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 26 15:22:06 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9EC16A4EC
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:22:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sirius.firepipe.net (sirius.firepipe.net [69.13.116.1])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F5B43D60
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:22:06 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from will@csociety.org)
Received: by sirius.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C3618791D; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:22:05 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:22:05 -0500
From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org>
To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
Message-ID: <20040326232205.GD57192@sirius.firepipe.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>, ports@freebsd.org
References: <opr5eiuf0f8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
	<c3uoks$193u$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> <4062FF7A.2040509@ciam.ru>
	<c3v3kn$1drs$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> <20040327013730.F96451@avim.ciam.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0/kgSOzhNoDC5T3a"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040327013730.F96451@avim.ciam.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sign your name in pkg-descr is useless or useful?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:22:06 -0000


--0/kgSOzhNoDC5T3a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 01:41:30AM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
>=20
> > * Will Andrews:
> >
> > > MAINTAINER=3D email@address Name1 Name2 Name3 ...
> > >
> > > ... this will still allow  programs that interpret MAINTAINER directly
> > > by taking the  second field (whitespace delimiter)  to work correctly,
> > > and makes writing said function simple.
> >
> > FWIW, there is also the Usenet notation:
> >
> > MAINTAINER=3D login@domain.com (FirstName LastName)
>=20
> IMHO the best is: FirstName LastName <login@domain.com>
> This notation should be passed to MTA and most MUA without modification
> AFAIK.

The reason I suggested the first syntax is so just the email
address could be simply parsed.

regards,
--=20
wca

--0/kgSOzhNoDC5T3a
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAZLsdF47idPgWcsURAovPAJ97dZPdCXDYMnMCkhKwg7KABIKpKwCdG1q0
+3xcFzgU9N9zm5f2qaCsLCo=
=Uh1E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0/kgSOzhNoDC5T3a--