From owner-freebsd-mobile Wed Oct 22 22:56:39 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA00947 for mobile-outgoing; Wed, 22 Oct 1997 22:56:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mobile) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (SRI-56K-FR.mt.net [206.127.65.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA00942 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 1997 22:56:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA06429; Wed, 22 Oct 1997 23:56:34 -0600 (MDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA13744; Wed, 22 Oct 1997 23:56:33 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 23:56:33 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199710230556.XAA13744@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mike Smith Cc: Nate Williams , mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patches from -current for -stable I'd like to commit after testing In-Reply-To: <199710230532.PAA00243@word.smith.net.au> References: <199710222132.PAA11576@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199710230532.PAA00243@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > My response: > > > > Can you try out this patch. > > Sure. Doesn't help though. 8( Allocating IRQ 11 to the pcic actually > seems harmless; we still get card insertion/removal interrupts, so it > must be working. OK, so that's not it. (Although it was on Brian Handy's TP560). > Unfortunately I just get the dreaded "driver allocation failed for ..." > messages, where I didn't before. Umm, if you're using IRQ 11, then I suspect your 3c589 card can't use it for itself. Do you have your configuration hard-coded to use IRQ 11? (I do, since I can't get it to work anywhere else for some silly reason.) > The kernel that works predates your hiding of the "interrupt > configuration" messages, if that's any help. I'm not sure I follow. Also note that I've made other changes recently which shouldn't make things any worse, but should make suspend/resume better in the default case. (More coming, I just did a code review and want to try out some more 'new' changes on my laptop to see if they make things better/worse.) Nate