Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 23:56:33 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patches from -current for -stable I'd like to commit after testing Message-ID: <199710230556.XAA13744@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199710230532.PAA00243@word.smith.net.au> References: <199710222132.PAA11576@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199710230532.PAA00243@word.smith.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > My response: > > > > Can you try out this patch. > > Sure. Doesn't help though. 8( Allocating IRQ 11 to the pcic actually > seems harmless; we still get card insertion/removal interrupts, so it > must be working. OK, so that's not it. (Although it was on Brian Handy's TP560). > Unfortunately I just get the dreaded "driver allocation failed for ..." > messages, where I didn't before. Umm, if you're using IRQ 11, then I suspect your 3c589 card can't use it for itself. Do you have your configuration hard-coded to use IRQ 11? (I do, since I can't get it to work anywhere else for some silly reason.) > The kernel that works predates your hiding of the "interrupt > configuration" messages, if that's any help. I'm not sure I follow. Also note that I've made other changes recently which shouldn't make things any worse, but should make suspend/resume better in the default case. (More coming, I just did a code review and want to try out some more 'new' changes on my laptop to see if they make things better/worse.) Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710230556.XAA13744>