From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 2 07:34:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 9782116A451; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 07:34:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: perforce@freebsd.org Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7083D16A445 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 07:34:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186F043D49 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 07:34:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [IPv6:::1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k527WMSu086754; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 01:32:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 01:32:25 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20060602.013225.-924278806.imp@bsdimp.com> To: hselasky@c2i.net From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <200606020856.11054.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <200605311657.44921.jhb@freebsd.org> <200606020856.11054.hselasky@c2i.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: perforce@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 98153 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 07:34:52 -0000 In message: <200606020856.11054.hselasky@c2i.net> Hans Petter Selasky writes: : On Friday 02 June 2006 02:26, Kip Macy wrote: : > > I'd rather avoid this for now as it will have to be backed out for : > > interrupt filters. : > : > I don't know anything about interrupt filters, so please let me know : > what you have in mind. The whole of interrupt handling is far too : > heavyweight at the moment. : > : : As long as your code is not Giant locked, the standard interrupt handlers : should not be that slow? They are very slow compared to a FAST interrupt handler, since there's a full context switch :-( Warner