From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov  8 08:50:01 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872C8106564A
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  8 Nov 2011 08:50:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471078FC16
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  8 Nov 2011 08:50:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA88o1P6018355
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:50:01 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pA88o1XT018354;
	Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:50:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Resent-Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:50:01 GMT
Resent-Message-Id: <201111080850.pA88o1XT018354@freefall.freebsd.org>
Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer)
Resent-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org,
	Yui NARUSE <naruse@airemix.jp>
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4A31065670
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>;
	Tue,  8 Nov 2011 08:42:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from red.freebsd.org (red.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::22])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1D68FC0A
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>;
	Tue,  8 Nov 2011 08:42:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from red.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by red.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA88gulg015679
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:42:56 GMT
	(envelope-from nobody@red.freebsd.org)
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
	by red.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pA88guL0015678;
	Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:42:56 GMT (envelope-from nobody)
Message-Id: <201111080842.pA88guL0015678@red.freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:42:56 GMT
From: Yui NARUSE <naruse@airemix.jp>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-3.1
Cc: 
Subject: kern/162374: posix_openpt wrongly removed O_CLOEXEC
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:50:01 -0000


>Number:         162374
>Category:       kern
>Synopsis:       posix_openpt wrongly removed O_CLOEXEC
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Nov 08 08:50:00 UTC 2011
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Yui NARUSE
>Release:        FreeBSD 9.0-RC1
>Organization:
>Environment:
FreeBSD windy.airemix.net 9.0-RC1 FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 #0: Tue Oct 18 18:51:43 UTC 2011     root@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64
>Description:
FreeBSD 8 undocumentedly supported O_CLOEXEC flag for posix_openpt.
But FreeBSD 9 removed it because it is not in SuSv4.
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/O-CLOEXEC-td4263370.html

However next SuS will add O_CLOEXEC for posix_openpt just as FreeBSD 8.2 did.
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=411

This means, FreeBSD 8.2 and future FreeBSD supports O_CLOEXEC for posix_openpt, but FreeBSD 9.0 doesn't. It is very confusing.
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: