Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:42:56 GMT From: Yui NARUSE <naruse@airemix.jp> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: kern/162374: posix_openpt wrongly removed O_CLOEXEC Message-ID: <201111080842.pA88guL0015678@red.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201111080850.pA88o1XT018354@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 162374 >Category: kern >Synopsis: posix_openpt wrongly removed O_CLOEXEC >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Tue Nov 08 08:50:00 UTC 2011 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Yui NARUSE >Release: FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 >Organization: >Environment: FreeBSD windy.airemix.net 9.0-RC1 FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 #0: Tue Oct 18 18:51:43 UTC 2011 root@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >Description: FreeBSD 8 undocumentedly supported O_CLOEXEC flag for posix_openpt. But FreeBSD 9 removed it because it is not in SuSv4. http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/O-CLOEXEC-td4263370.html However next SuS will add O_CLOEXEC for posix_openpt just as FreeBSD 8.2 did. http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=411 This means, FreeBSD 8.2 and future FreeBSD supports O_CLOEXEC for posix_openpt, but FreeBSD 9.0 doesn't. It is very confusing. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201111080842.pA88guL0015678>