Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 01 Aug 2014 19:57:23 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 127920] [pf] ipv6 and synproxy don't play well together
Message-ID:  <bug-127920-17777-7RyvE3PxIy@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-127920-17777@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-127920-17777@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127920

--- Comment #6 from vegeta@tuxpowered.net ---
pf_test6() is missing a check for M_SKIP_FIREWALL flags on mbuf, this flag is
present on packets sent via pf_send_tcp(), like SYN+ACK reply to client.

Following patch fixes the issue (line numbers will not match, I have a lot of
other patches on pf):

@@ -6068,6 +6211,9 @@ pf_test6(int dir, struct ifnet *ifp, struct mbuf **m0,
struct inpcb *inp)
        if (kif->pfik_flags & PFI_IFLAG_SKIP)
                return (PF_PASS);

+       if (m->m_flags & M_SKIP_FIREWALL)
+               return (PF_PASS);
+
        PF_RULES_RLOCK();

        /* We do IP header normalization and packet reassembly here */

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-127920-17777-7RyvE3PxIy>