From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 20:27:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BE5C1C; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 20:27:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jilles@stack.nl) Received: from mx1.stack.nl (relay02.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::104]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D0BB2870; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 20:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from snail.stack.nl (snail.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::131]) by mx1.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6792358C60; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:27:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by snail.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 1677) id CD97C28494; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:27:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:27:25 +0200 From: Jilles Tjoelker To: Sergey Kandaurov Subject: Re: svn commit: r254600 - head/lib/libutil Message-ID: <20130821202725.GA4991@stack.nl> References: <201308211646.r7LGk6eV051215@svn.freebsd.org> <5214F72B.7070006@freebsd.org> <20130821190309.GB52908@omg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130821190309.GB52908@omg> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Andrey Chernov X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 20:27:31 -0000 On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:03:10PM +0400, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:21:47PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > On 21.08.2013 20:46, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > > > number = strtoumax(buf, &endptr, 0); > > > > > > + if (number == UINTMAX_MAX && errno == ERANGE) { > > > + return (-1); > > > + } > > You need to reset errno before strtoumax() call (errno = 0), because any > > of previous functions may left it as ERANGE. > Thanks for pointing out. > Does the patch look good? > Index: expand_number.c > =================================================================== > --- expand_number.c (revision 254600) > +++ expand_number.c (working copy) > @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ > unsigned shift; > char *endptr; > > + errno = 0; > + > number = strtoumax(buf, &endptr, 0); > > if (number == UINTMAX_MAX && errno == ERANGE) { > This may cause the function to set errno=0 if it is successful, which is not allowed for standard library functions from C and POSIX. There may be a problem not only if expand_number() is standardized but also if it is used in the implementation of a standard library function. The best solution is to save and restore errno around this (if [ERANGE] is detected, that is a valid errno value to keep). In an application it is acceptable to set errno=0 without further ado. -- Jilles Tjoelker