From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 23 10:38:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4449037B401; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 10:38:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7A443F3F; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 10:38:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3NHccmA074013 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:38:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h3NHccFq074010; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:38:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:38:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200304231738.h3NHccFq074010@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: David Schultz In-Reply-To: <20030423131109.GA13008@HAL9000.homeunix.com> References: <20030422202647.7D3D4C4@freebsd.org.ru> <20030423071726.M19073@gamplex.bde.org> <20030422214740.GB73209@freebsd.org.ru> <20030423131109.GA13008@HAL9000.homeunix.com> cc: "Sergey A. Osokin" cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: standards/51292: [PATCH] add ecvt()/fcvt()/gcvt() functions (SUSv3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:38:41 -0000 < said: > Nobody uses these functions anymore, so it doesn't seem particularly > useful to implement them now, given that snprintf() provides almost > equivalent functionality. However, it doesn't hurt to have them, even if we are not targeting XSI compliance. > Any active standards that still require them will most likely drop > them in the near future. POSIX has a five-year review cycle. -GAWollman