From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jul 2 1:16:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net [151.164.30.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BB337BB80; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@holly.calldei.com) Received: from holly.calldei.com ([208.191.149.190]) by mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with ESMTP id <0FX2004809NY8L@mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net>; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 03:16:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from chris@localhost) by holly.calldei.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA81207; Sun, 02 Jul 2000 03:14:16 -0500 (CDT envelope-from chris) Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2000 03:14:15 -0500 From: Chris Costello Subject: Re: /sys hierarchy In-reply-to: <200007020736.AAA33902@john.baldwin.cx> To: John Baldwin Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, Will Andrews , obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chris@calldei.com Message-id: <20000702031414.A66762@holly.calldei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.4i References: <40081.962483740@localhost> <200007020736.AAA33902@john.baldwin.cx> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sunday, July 02, 2000, John Baldwin wrote: > ip/ - IPv4, IPv6, and IPsec bits from sys/netinet{,6} > tcp/ - TCP " " " " > udp/ - UDP " " " " Can this really be separated to such a degree? Since TCP and UDP are inet protocols, do they _need_ to be separated this way? -- |Chris Costello |You can't make a program without broken egos. `--------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message