From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Tue Dec 1 09:16:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872AAA3C0AB; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 09:16:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65B2A1CA8; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 09:16:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from [10.215.22.191] (178.115.129.251.wireless.dyn.drei.com [178.115.129.251]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A35453F429; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 04:16:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 10:15:44 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Ashish SHUKLA cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r402637 - in head/editors/emacs-devel: . files In-Reply-To: <201511300024.tAU0Oxmj090445@repo.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <201511300024.tAU0Oxmj090445@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 09:16:16 -0000 On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: > -LTO_CONFIGURE_ON= --enable-link-time-optimization > -LTO_USE= GCC=4.6+ > +LTO_CONFIGURE_ON= --enable-link-time-optimization > +LTO_USE= GCC=4.6+ Have you considered making this GCC=yes? That would be my recommendation since it will build on the canonical version of GCC in the ports tree (which is based on GCC 4.8 right now). (And GCC 4.6 and 4.7 are no longer maintained upstream, plus their LTO system a lot more immature.) Cheers, Gerald