From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 17:10:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C6916A420 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:10:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drue@therub.org) Received: from conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (conn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F76843D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:10:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drue@therub.org) Received: from egypt.therub.org (therub.org [209.98.146.43]) by conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E928396 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:10:19 -0600 (CST) Received: by egypt.therub.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7BF1645677A; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:10:19 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:10:19 -0600 From: Dan Rue To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051108171019.GF27437@therub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Hi - I have question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:10:23 -0000 On Tue Nov 1 06:10:18 PST 2005, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On 2005-10-31 18:42, Nataly Afek wrote: >> 1) I'm working with Freebsd 5.3 and i want to know >> when will the support of this version will be finished? > >5.3-RELEASE was an "early adopter" release. Sice then, a lot of >important bugs have been fixed in the RELENG_5 branch. You should >definitely try updating to a newer version, like 5.4-RELEASE or even >5-STABLE, as soon as possible. This is bad advise. 5.3 was not an early adopter release - it was the first stable/production release of the 5 branch. Furthermore, according to http://www.freebsd.org/security/, it is support until at least October 31, 2006. The original poster just has to update 5.3 to get the latest security updates according to the handbook. And lastly, it is bad advise to upgrade to 5-STABLE. 5-STABLE is the 5 development branch, and should not be run unless you know better. General users should stick with releases. In this case, the original poster's options are stay with 5.3 (and probably grab the security updates), upgrade to 5.4, or to 6.0. Dan.