Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:10:17 +0100
From:      Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
To:        perryh@pluto.rain.com
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, db@db.net
Subject:   Re: Why not give git a try? (was "Re: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64")
Message-ID:  <AANLkTi=DGSVuQ_JEBRr9eKx9Kt0-PWa-NWeiBeEUiaCs@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4d3ea46a.NnLdm55dZduBwzWN%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
References:  <AANLkTi=-VsVpXH-549UNuHcNZfBH_YHrN-9JBpgWh4A8@mail.gmail.com> <ihjv30$rmd$1@dough.gmane.org> <20110124183102.GB68940@night.db.net> <AANLkTikXs39MQ4kvM4=thoANn596zTGSB=PfTQ545Fon@mail.gmail.com> <20110124194830.GA70207@night.db.net> <4d3ea46a.NnLdm55dZduBwzWN%perryh@pluto.rain.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 January 2011 11:22,  <perryh@pluto.rain.com> wrote:
> Diane Bruce <db@db.net> wrote:
>
>> There certainly would not be a chance of putting
>> mercurial or git into base for example.
>
> Completely apart from licensing, another strike against
> mercurial is that it is written in Python, so it couldn't
> go into base unless Python also went into base.

Of course. OTOH, this topic will only become relevant if anyone
notices that Subversion gets committed into base ;)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=DGSVuQ_JEBRr9eKx9Kt0-PWa-NWeiBeEUiaCs>