From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Jan 27 14:01:24 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA17426
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 14:01:24 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA17411
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 14:01:19 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com)
Received: (from dillon@localhost)
	by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) id OAA61764;
	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 14:01:18 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dillon)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 14:01:18 -0800 (PST)
From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Message-Id: <199901272201.OAA61764@apollo.backplane.com>
to: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: bug in devfs_strategy() ???
References:  <199901272135.NAA57832@apollo.backplane.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

    Aren't there are few BREAK statements missing from this ?

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>

static int      
devfs_strategy(struct vop_strategy_args *ap)
{
	...
        switch (ap->a_vp->v_type) {
        case VCHR:
                (*dnp->by.Cdev.cdevsw->d_strategy)(bp);
        case VBLK:
                (*dnp->by.Bdev.bdevsw->d_strategy)(bp);
        }       
        return (0);
}



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message