From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 18 17:30:26 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4F6FB1
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:30:26 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from davide.damico@contactlab.com)
Received: from mail2.shared.smtp.contactlab.it
 (mail2.shared.smtp.contactlab.it [93.94.37.7])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46214B56
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:30:25 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=contactlab.it; s=clab1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 q=dns/txt; i=@contactlab.it; t=1363627824;
 h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
 bh=oWCgdyOTGKjdYxIt5UJCpZ5Mg2l3GsYl0riHr51dVK4=;
 b=T05owhKo6zWh3nz85j5r0N06m/T/N0CIVO889jTqt9Sj1c7GTLIPHFLkOlOgDcVK
 BJ2Lrhn7DB8cHWZbLFIPxDdnDYp0Vuf+gPhVPkwraGzBOYQ113MAl8xEYL/1n76j
 WdWf3F9QDklWt/P0amDXJUX99xdWStHC4ZmJrl/g0gs=;
Received: from [213.92.90.12] ([213.92.90.12:30244] helo=mail3.tomato.it)
 by t.contactlab.it (envelope-from <davide.damico@contactlab.com>)
 (ecelerity 3.5.1.37854 r(Momo-dev:3.5.1.0)) with ESMTP
 id D2/00-24145-03F47415; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:30:24 +0100
Received: from mx3-master.housing.tomato.lan ([172.16.7.55])
 by mail3.tomato.it with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <davide.damico@contactlab.com>) id 1UHdtA-0004eH-GT
 for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:30:24 +0100
Received: (qmail 17869 invoked by uid 89); 18 Mar 2013 17:30:24 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO davepro.local) (127.0.0.1)
 by mx3-master.housing.tomato.lan with SMTP; 18 Mar 2013 17:30:24 -0000
Message-ID: <51474F2F.5040003@contactlab.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:30:23 +0100
From: Davide D'Amico <davide.damico@contactlab.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
Subject: Re: FreBSD 9.1 and ZFS v28 performances
References: <514729BD.2000608@contactlab.com>
 <810E5C08C2D149DBAC94E30678234995@multiplay.co.uk>
 <51473D1D.3050306@contactlab.com>
 <1DD6360145924BE0ABF2D0979287F5F4@multiplay.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <1DD6360145924BE0ABF2D0979287F5F4@multiplay.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:30:26 -0000


>
> So RAID10 on just 6 disks in effect just 3 active spindles? If so then your
> throughput of 400MB/s is about right.
Well, my RAID10 is on 4 disk (2 spindle) so do I have 400MB/s (3GBps) 
because the max throughput is 6Gbps?

Thanks,
d.