From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 14 00:30:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 467B07F6 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 00:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A8D81797 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 00:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s3E0U0UT092116 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 00:30:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s3E0U0Xx092114; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 00:30:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 00:30:00 GMT Message-Id: <201404140030.s3E0U0Xx092114@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Miguel Clara Subject: Re: misc/188369: FreeBSD 10 XENHVM panic under NetBSD Dom0 (xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Miguel Clara List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 00:30:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR misc/188369; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Miguel Clara To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, miguelmclara@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: misc/188369: FreeBSD 10 XENHVM panic under NetBSD Dom0 (xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 01:22:34 +0100 --047d7b5d28583db35704f6f5af4e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 There's another report about this here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=182903 I was browsing trough my reports on the xen list and notice I even refereed to it at the time. Should this be close has a duplicate? Also I've been reporting this and testing since at least June 2013 (See http://thr3ads.net/xen-users/2013/06/2653989-Re-FreeBSD-PVHVM-call-for-testing) long before FreeBSD-10 was released. And the PR I mention is from Oct 2013. Both reports are marked has non-critical and of low-priority. Should I assume FreeBSD is not to be supported in NetBSD DOM0's anymore? Please don't take this the wrong way, I understand not all things can be done, just want to know If I should forget about this and keep with FreeBSD-9 or migrate the Dom0 to Linux! Thanks --047d7b5d28583db35704f6f5af4e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
There's another report about this here:


I was browsing trough my reports on the xen list and notice I even refereed= to it at the time.
Should this be close has a duplicate?

Also I&= #39;ve been reporting this and testing since at least June 2013 (See=A0http://thr3ads.net/xen-users/2013/06/2653989-Re-FreeBSD-PVHVM-c= all-for-testing) long before FreeBSD-10 was released.

And the PR I mention is from Oct 2013.

Both repo= rts are marked has non-critical and of low-priority.

Shou= ld I assume FreeBSD is not to be supported in NetBSD DOM0's anymore?

Please don't take this the wrong way, I under= stand not all things can be done, just want to know If I should forget abou= t this and keep with FreeBSD-9 or migrate the Dom0 to Linux!

Thanks
--047d7b5d28583db35704f6f5af4e--