Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:53:15 +0400 From: Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> To: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Ashant Chalasani <sys@sellerbay.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Install port without man page Message-ID: <20080424055311.GF1449@amilo.cenkes.org> In-Reply-To: <200804151934.36301.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> References: <6a5b467e0804150907u20d1163fo27c067c025d8b08c@mail.gmail.com> <200804151934.36301.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 07:34:35PM +0200, Mel wrote: > On Tuesday 15 April 2008 18:07:42 Ashant Chalasani wrote: > > > Is there a way to install a port without the man-pages. I'm trying to > > install a dhcp server onto a Tinybsd image and end up buying myself a > > bunch of files in /man, as seen at > > http://code.google.com/p/tinybsdap/wiki/InstallingPorts (hope the > > linking is not minded). > > If the port controls installing the manpages, then you can set > NO_INSTALL_MANPAGES in /etc/make.conf. NO_INSTALL_MANPAGES is traditionally just an imake-related hack, which is hardly respected, but rather used. At the moment there is no policy or knob to control manpage installation. However, many ports respect MANPREFIX/MANxPREFIX.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080424055311.GF1449>