From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri May 16 08:17:12 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA03054 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 16 May 1997 08:17:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fps.biblos.unal.edu.co ([168.176.37.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA03045 for ; Fri, 16 May 1997 08:17:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost by fps.biblos.unal.edu.co (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA15166; Fri, 16 May 1997 10:17:06 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 10:17:06 -0500 (EST) From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" To: Ben Black Cc: "David S. Miller" , thorpej@nas.nasa.gov, rminnich@sarnoff.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Cluster Computing in BSD In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 16 May 1997, Ben Black wrote: > i think the real reason for the 6 CPU limit has been suggested. > commercial release. note the lack of black helicopters for that explanation. > > b3n > Funds for MOSIX came from the Israeli Ministry of Defense, and the Ministry of Science (and Energy?)...I think there are some black helicopters over there. Pedro. > On Fri, 16 May 1997, David S. Miller wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 00:40:13 -0400 (EDT) > > From: Ben Black > > > > the current RC5 distributed cracking effort shows quite clearly > > that something as advanced as MOSIX is not required. if his logic > > is that bad guys will use MOSIX to crack encryption brute force > > then he is fooling himself. > > > > And besides, as far as MO6 goes, all I have to say is that adb is your > > friend... > > >