From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 11 18:53:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B508216A468 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:53:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from s200aog14.obsmtp.com (s200aog14.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FBD013C4CE for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from source ([217.206.187.80]) by eu1sys200aob014.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:53:12 UTC Received: from bill.mintel.co.uk (bill.mintel.co.uk [10.0.0.89]) by rodney.mintel.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572BE181420; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:53:12 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4787BB17.70504@tomjudge.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:53:11 +0000 From: Tom Judge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Ullrich References: <200710272311.09059.max@love2party.net> <200712091835.33608.max@love2party.net> <8e10486b0801090741k605d7183gfb8bbdfa55fce331@mail.gmail.com> <200801110408.22724.max@love2party.net> <8e10486b0801102018h4f417a4ex900bdaeb078bd29e@mail.gmail.com> <8e10486b0801110252w452f3e4asf438beb6297eb1f@mail.gmail.com> <8e10486b0801110949u1593e427wc24493b98d0003d2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: carpdev ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:53:16 -0000 Scott Ullrich wrote: > On 1/11/08, Alexandre Biancalana wrote: > > BTW: I did not know about ifconfig interconnect... Cool stuff!! > This would appear to be as the result of a command such as: ifconfig em0 name interconnect And as such you can rename any interface on your system. I'm not sure how PF state entries deal with this situation (i.e if there is a state associated with interconnect does the state store the interface name as em0 or interconnect). If the latter is true then it would make using disparate hardware for HA firewalls much simpler, and attainable. Tom