From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 14:29:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884BE16A4CE; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:29:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B56743D39; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:29:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (64-144-75-100.client.dsl.net [64.144.75.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBDET9ag053611 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:29:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:29:10 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes To: Joseph Koshy Message-ID: <20041213092910.680170d7@localhost> In-Reply-To: <84dead72041212193169c12e38@mail.gmail.com> References: <20041211145337.GC34046@clan.nothing-going-on.org> <84dead72041212193169c12e38@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: doc@FreeBSD.org cc: Nik Clayton Subject: Re: Kwalitee X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:29:11 -0000 On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:01:38 +0530 Joseph Koshy wrote: > Nik, > > > I'm wondering if we can adopt this idea for the FDP. Can we come up > > I'm wary of metrics as I've seen way too many organizations optimize for the > metric instead of focussing on the real thing. > > That said, it would be cool to have a web page where we could look up the > current 'kwalitee' of our documentation. > > > So to kick off, some metrics we might use, and the rationale behind > > them. It should be possible to mechanically check each metric. > > I like all of these. > > Here are some more suggestions: > > For users: > > Metric: Number of undocumented programs > Rationale: Every program should have a manual page. whatis(1) should > "just work". Every utility (your word: program), driver, function. > > And for programmers trying to use FreeBSD, the following: > > Metric: Number of undocumented APIs > Rationale: Every visible symbol in our libraries should have a description > in a manual page. > > Metric: Number of undocumented kernel APIs > Rationale: Same as above. > > The intent for these two is to make FreeBSD a nice platform to develop on. ... ... ... ... -- Tom Rhodes