Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 21:04:18 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@dk.tfs.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: peter@spinner.dialix.com, smp@csn.net, dg@root.com, freebsd-smp@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: sys/i386/isa isa.c Message-ID: <1861.861649458@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 22 Apr 1997 04:46:40 %2B1000." <199704211846.EAA16329@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199704211846.EAA16329@godzilla.zeta.org.au>, Bruce Evans writes: >>Which I should mention, AUTO_EOI_1 is thought to work on all systems, but >>AUTO_EOI_2 is thought to not work on a good number of systems. I seem to > >AUTO_EOI_1 is thought to work on all systems except phk's laptop :-)... > >>have crossed wires somewhere thought, I thought AUTO_EOI_1 was turned on >>by default quite some time ago, but it doesn't seem that way in the code. > >... so it didn't stat enabled by default for long. Well, I had more than my laptop complain actually. The problem seems to be a fair share of the systems that use power management, with or without APM. Can we make it a flag settable with "boot -c", then we can try to enable it again... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Power and ignorance is a disgusting cocktail.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1861.861649458>