From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 8 13:48:40 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA15731 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 8 Mar 1996 13:48:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA15719 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 1996 13:48:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA00335; Fri, 8 Mar 1996 13:47:41 -0800 Message-Id: <199603082147.NAA00335@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95 To: dennis@etinc.com (dennis) cc: Terry Lambert , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD or BSDI In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 08 Mar 1996 14:54:47 EST." <199603081954.OAA06550@etinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1996 13:47:40 -0800 From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >>> dennis said: > >> >I agree, BUT, that list of users can't look into the sources to try > >> >to find an answer.... > >> > >> Why not? I have source....and so do many others. You just can't give > >> it to anyone. > > > >8-). > > > >Once you find the answer and fix it, can you give them a binary patch? > > I guess you could, however it makes more sense to submit it to > BSDI and let them do it officially. > Provided of course that they like your fix 8) Cheers, Amancio