From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jan 20 02:01:43 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA05767 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 02:01:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from camel.ethereal.net (camel.ethereal.net [206.79.74.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA05758 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 02:01:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mistwolf@camel.ethereal.net) Received: (from mistwolf@localhost) by camel.ethereal.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id CAA12128; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 02:00:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <19990120020041.B11697@ethereal.net> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 02:00:41 -0800 From: Jamie Norwood To: Mike Meyer , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD need a -notreallyrelatedtoFreeBSDbut mailing list? References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: ; from Mike Meyer on Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 10:25:04PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I agree. A list like this would go a long way in getting FreeBSD more widely accepted. While -chat may seem appropriate, I think Mike's point against it is valid, that people who are looking for concrete answers to questions about applications or configurations that are not relevant to -questions should not be reduced to putting them in a list that has a high post rate. A dedicated list would be excellent as people who do use these real-world applications and problems would be able to communicate without being flooded by tons of messages that provide no useful FreeBSD knowledge. Also, professionals who will want to read these lists at their places of work may be more hesitant to join a list that is 75% fluff and 25% useful information. I think -chat is a good bonding tool for the people in the community. I think a list like -applications or -production would be very important as a bonding tool in the business community, where it is much more important to get information in a quick and fluff-free way. It is a question of how we want to be seen. Big companies don't want, as Mike points out, a conversation about toon ferrets. While it is an interesting conversation for people, for someone trying to get a job done it is less than useful, and is in fact a hinderence, since if someone reviews their work practices and sees them receiving a ton of messages having nothing to do with their job, it will reflect badly on them, and by associtation, free software as a whole. Please consider this list seriously. I know I, for one, would be very happy to have a place where I could read what people are really doing and the problems they solve on this fantastic OS. Thank you, Jamie On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 10:25:04PM -0800, Mike Meyer wrote: > > That isn't the way I read the charter for -chat. It looks like a > catchall for *nontechnical* issues. Is looking for some specific > application - or having problems with a third-party app - a > nontechnical issue? In particular, do we want people trying to get an > answer to such a question to have to wade through, for instance, > discussion about whether Jordan looks like a toon ferret or not, to > get it? > > Either a new list, or a (rather minor, actually) broadening of the > charter for questions to include these issues would certainly be a > better solution. > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message