From owner-freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 20:33:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EACF1065673 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 20:33:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vwe@freebsd.org) Received: from gwmbg.elbekies.net (gwmbg.elbekies.net [217.6.211.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14EE68FC0C for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 20:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bel.soho.vwsoft.com (p57A0A895.dip.t-dialin.net [87.160.168.149]) (Authenticated sender: relay@elbekies.net) by gwmbg.elbekies.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7960A2FA; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 21:15:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.16.4] (dardanos.sz.vwsoft.com [192.168.16.4]) by bel.soho.vwsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5579733CA0; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 21:12:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F11E1BA.2010404@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 21:12:42 +0100 From: vwe@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-ID: 5579733CA0.A5DD3 X-VWSoft-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: vwe@freebsd.org X-MailScanner-To: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org, linimon@lonesome.com, utisoft@gmail.com MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1327176770.93216@YKbPztUfiQHA0Cd7P75hGw Cc: Mark Linimon , freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnats port disappeared?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Coordination of the Problem Report handling effort." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 20:33:43 -0000 Hi Chris! On 01/14/12 17:41, Chris Rees wrote: > Hey Mark, > > Got a bit of a shock: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/databases/gnats/Attic/Makefile > > Did you know about this? It's innocent and reasonable, but possibly a mistake. > > I was going to prepare a patch for GNATS so it didn't get confused by > subjects like > > Fwd: Re: ports/152537: [patch] database/postgresql90-server no longer needs > > Would there be interest in such a patch? Would you like the port > resurrected, or should I just let you use a local copy? Latest databases/gnats Makefile had this for a while before removal of the port: FORBIDDEN= Security issues DEPRECATED= ${FORBIDDEN} EXPIRATION_DATE= 2011-09-30 So it's clearly not a mistake, but a portsmgr decision. Also everything else has to be decided by portsmgr but a port with unfixed security issues over a long period of time seems a good candidate to be removed. Interestingly on freefall `pkg_info -o '*gnats*'` gives: Origin: databases/gnats I'm glad I'm not part of clusteradm ;) as this might break some day into pieces and needs attention. Regards, Volker