From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 7 9:43:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from etinc.com (et-gw.etinc.com [207.252.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7638014C27 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 09:43:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dennis@etinc.com) Received: from dbsys (dbsys.etinc.com [207.252.1.18]) by etinc.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA02374; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 12:40:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199904071640.MAA02374@etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 11:35:53 -0400 To: Jos Backus From: Dennis Subject: Re: bpfilters in 2.2.8 Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <19990407181309.A6068@hal.mpn.cp.philips.com> References: <199904071513.LAA01121@etinc.com> <199904071513.LAA01121@etinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 06:13 PM 4/7/99 +0200, you wrote: >On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 10:09:01AM -0400, Dennis wrote: >> No matter whan I do bpfilter.h generates >> >> NBPFILTER 0 >> >> is this a bug in 2.2.8? Is there something else I need to do? >> >> Dennis > >Also, when building, say, the if_tun module, ${NBPFILTER} isn't being set, >causing tcpdump to fail on the tunnel device afterwards. actually I spelled it wrong (bpfilters instead of bpfilter)....2.2.8 doesnt complain and it probably should. dennis To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message