From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 30 18:38:51 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8426106566C
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:38:51 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from a_best01@uni-muenster.de)
Received: from zivm-out2.uni-muenster.de (ZIVM-OUT2.UNI-MUENSTER.DE
	[128.176.192.9])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C97B8FC1A
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:38:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from a_best01@uni-muenster.de)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,318,1243807200"; d="scan'208";a="217479031"
Received: from zivmaildisp2.uni-muenster.de (HELO
	ZIVMAILUSER03.UNI-MUENSTER.DE) ([128.176.188.143])
	by zivm-relay2.uni-muenster.de with ESMTP; 30 Jun 2009 20:38:50 +0200
Received: by ZIVMAILUSER03.UNI-MUENSTER.DE (Postfix, from userid 149459)
	id 3AB131B0741; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:38:50 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:38:49 +0200 (CEST)
From: Alexander Best <alexbestms@math.uni-muenster.de>
Sender: <a_best01@uni-muenster.de>
Organization: Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet Muenster
To: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>
Message-ID: <permail-200906301838491e86ffa800001d04-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>
In-Reply-To: <200906301828.n5UISAd0035828@triton.kn-bremen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: nspluginwrapper patch for testing (was: Re: flash10 vs f10)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:38:52 -0000

i'm running compat.linux.osrelease: 2.6.16 and r195173 (CURRENT).

yep. the warning comes up if a users stacksize is limited < 32M. flash works
great and the HD button isn't causing any problems.

maybe it's possible to ad something like

if ulimit < 32m then don't change ulimit and prinf("not setting new ulimit due
to stacksize limitation").

something like that....

cheers.

Juergen Lock schrieb am 2009-06-30:
> In article
> <permail-20090630175552f7e55a9d00001ea5-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>
> you write:
> >getting this on x86:

> >ulimit: bad limit: Operation not permitted
> >ulimit: bad limit: Operation not permitted

> Hmm did you alreadly lower the stack limit below 32M? (what does
> ulimit -a
> say?)  Does flash work correctly for you, i.e. things like the
> youtube
> `watch in hd' button?  If yes I guess we can just redirect the error
> message to /dev/null since a lower stack limit than 32M should not
> stop
> flash from working and we can't raise it easily from sh anyway...

>  Oh and also, which FreeBSD and Linux base/nonbase versions is that?

>  Thanx,
>         Juergen