From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Oct 18 6:18:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC35937B409; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 06:18:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 15uD4j-0007hc-00; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 15:19:05 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: "Andrey A. Chernov" , ports@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Apache port change from nobody:nogroup to www:www planned In-reply-to: Your message of "18 Oct 2001 14:45:04 +0200." Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 15:19:05 +0200 Message-ID: <29611.1003411145@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 18 Oct 2001 14:45:04 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > So do you propose to do away with nobody as the username under which to > > run daemons? > > Nobody has never been the username under which to run daemons. It is > a special user that is not supposed to own any files or processes. Oh, really. I didn't know that. So the anti-nobody drive is actually broader than I first understood, at first. So when exim needs to be run as "the unpriveleged user" (nobody by default), which user should I use? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message