Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 03 Mar 2019 01:57:08 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 236170] ports-mgmt/portmaster exclude option
Message-ID:  <bug-236170-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236170

            Bug ID: 236170
           Summary: ports-mgmt/portmaster exclude option
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Many People
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: se@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: mikhail.rokhin@gmail.com
          Assignee: se@FreeBSD.org
             Flags: maintainer-feedback?(se@FreeBSD.org)

As it is now for ` -x ` option
  for `-a` case : `-x firefox` =3D `-x firefox\*` =3D `-x \*firefox\*` =3D =
`-x
/firefox\*` - it uses value to pattern *firefox*

Question is - how should I exclude `firefox\*` pattern ?

  for `portname portname ...` case: `/` should be followed by name to exclu=
de
and works like `-x /firefox\*` to exclude any port beginning with `firefox\=
*` .

Why do I need it? I don't want to compile huge ports like firefox, llvm, et=
c.
and they are updated via `pkg upgrade`. Now in case of `-a` option I can't
control it properly - for `-x llvm` it excludes needed to be excluded llvm7=
0,
llvm80 ... and needed to be included py36*llvm* either.

Portmaster is 3.19_18 .

Please, point me to ways, whether I fail.

Thank you for development.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-236170-7788>