From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 3 16:40:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F441065790 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:40:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299548FC23 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NciGs-0005cU-JS for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:40:06 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:40:06 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:40:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:39:06 +0100 Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <201002031024.03835.dmw@coder.cl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20100118 Thunderbird/3.0 In-Reply-To: <201002031024.03835.dmw@coder.cl> Sender: news Subject: Re: Does getc(3) use the read(2) syscall? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:40:15 -0000 On 02/03/10 14:23, Daniel Molina Wegener wrote: > On Wednesday 03 February 2010, > Stefan Midjich wrote: >> So my question is primarily, does getc use the read system call eventually? > > No, certainly not. I think you missed the "eventually" part :) Eventually, it does - but not for every single byte read.