Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 10 Feb 1996 09:07:37 -0500 (EST)
From:      Jerry Kendall <jerry@kcis.com>
To:        Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: POSIX 1003.1b compliance (timespec revisited)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.960210090652.2558B-100000@antares.kcis.com>
In-Reply-To: <199602100311.UAA13389@phaeton.artisoft.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Fri, 9 Feb 1996, Terry Lambert wrote:

> > I recently posted a note to this list about the FreeBSD definition of
> > timespec and the fact that it does not comply with IEEE 1003.1b-1993.
> > I noted that NetBSD was about to make the change. Well the NetBSD change
> > has happened and has found its way to at least a mirror at this end of the
> > earth. So how about making the change to FreeBSD too?
> 
> These structures are everywhere. 8-(.
> 
> Not to mention that "time" in kernel.h is referenced directly instead
> of via a macro.  8-(.
> 
> The cleanup on these things should probably wait until after David
> Greenman integrates the Lite2 code.  I think NetBSD did this some
> time ago.
> 

For those of us, myself included, what is this 'Lite2' code ??

Jerry




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960210090652.2558B-100000>