From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 16:57:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DA816A41C; Tue, 31 May 2005 16:57:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C077143D4C; Tue, 31 May 2005 16:57:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IHD002LBBN0VF10@osl1smout1.broadpark.no>; Tue, 31 May 2005 21:04:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dsa.des.no ([80.203.228.37]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IHD00BK15XL2YI7@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no>; Tue, 31 May 2005 19:00:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dsa.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id D819945165; Tue, 31 May 2005 18:57:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from xps.des.no (xps.des.no [10.0.0.12]) by dsa.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 065D745131; Tue, 31 May 2005 18:57:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DB3A533C3B; Tue, 31 May 2005 18:57:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 18:57:09 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) In-reply-to: To: Hajimu UMEMOTO Message-id: <86k6lfbafu.fsf@xps.des.no> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on dsa.des.no References: <20050531.075329.118637972.imp@bsdimp.com> <20050531.084832.20036038.imp@bsdimp.com> <86fyw32yqm.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: Cc: nectar@freebsd.org, standards@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFR] correct type of addrinfo.ai_addrlen and netent.n_net X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:57:16 -0000 Hajimu UMEMOTO writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav writes: > > You can't just bump libpam; you need to bump all the modules along > > with it, because libpam will only load modules with the same major > > number as itself. In fact, there is only a single SHLIB_MAJOR for the > > entire src/lib/libpam tree, in src/lib/libpam/Makefile.inc. > Thank you for clarification. My patch bumps SHLIB_MAJOR in > lib/libpam/Makefile.inc. As PAM maintainer, I strongly object. > > Is it really necessary to remove the padding? It gives us a lot of > > trouble for zero gain. > I think such cleanup should be done before major release. What do we gain from removing the padding? Is there even a single practical benefit to doing so? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no