From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Mar 20 16:29:46 1995 Return-Path: bugs-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA15968 for bugs-outgoing; Mon, 20 Mar 1995 16:29:46 -0800 Received: from limbic.ssdl.com (limbic.ssdl.com [192.111.251.33]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA15962 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 1995 16:29:44 -0800 Received: (from gil@localhost) by limbic.ssdl.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id SAA02472; Mon, 20 Mar 1995 18:29:12 -0600 From: "Gil Kloepfer Jr." Message-Id: <199503210029.SAA02472@limbic.ssdl.com> Subject: Re: bin/257: wtmp not properly updated in uucpd To: gvrooij@mmra1.ms.philips.nl (Guido van Rooij) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 1995 18:29:11 -0600 (CST) Cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: <9503200817.AA01232@mmra1.ms.philips.nl> from "Guido van Rooij" at Mar 20, 95 09:17:30 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1344 Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > >Description: > > > > 0. uucpd on FreeBSD 2.0R does not function properly at all (which is OK > > since 2.1-current mostly works) > > > > Change the define of BSD43 in the Makefile to BSD_43 (or vice versa... > just check the sources) Are you sure you're talking about the FreeBSD 2.0-RELEASE source here? Maybe I misunderstood you (see below)...but if not, what you're saying here doesn't work either. The problems with the 2.0-R version are numerous, including: 1. in pathnames.h, the wrong path to uucico is given 2. in the Makefile, it defines BSD42 instead of BSD4_2 (maybe this was what you meant) 3. for a reason I have not bothered to figure out, the readline for the password always falls through and produces a Login incorrect. before the password can be entered. Again, this is a moot point since the problems I mentioned above are fixed in the 2.1-development version of uucpd, but there are some problems with it that I mentioned in the rest of my problem report and provided a fix for it. Since the new 2.1 version works much better, I can't see beating the 2.0 horse to death... Thanks for the reply though. I did miss the BSD4_2 in the Makefile on my first go-round of this! It did make me go back and try compiling it again! -- Gil Kloepfer e-mail: gil@SSDL.COM WWW: http://www.ssdl.com/~gil/