From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 18 12:27:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A412016A691 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:27:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55D043D49 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:27:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x29so26426nfb for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 05:27:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to; b=JjOUJWXJgHnGo6BmVQgc8Bicry2uRcnbxJ4VSPXrbWhZDaR36rl9FNnX9XT8FlFuWTfuKWi3nYHn378y4g24B7TSz0n0UiZJeHoGRFTnm362eWLdtMRXJqBUF1G/D6s9bO/dBOxEM+H6bx2Tbiq5H4DN7OAlyWtgUKpmvAdsQco= Received: by 10.49.71.16 with SMTP id y16mr477230nfk; Thu, 18 May 2006 05:20:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from roadrunner.q.local ( [217.185.119.162]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id p43sm635541nfa.2006.05.18.05.20.33; Thu, 18 May 2006 05:20:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from roadrunner.q.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roadrunner.q.local (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4ICJxOA003568 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 14:20:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: (from q@localhost) by roadrunner.q.local (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k4ICAerT003409 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 May 2006 14:10:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 14:10:40 +0200 From: Ulrich Spoerlein To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060518121040.GF1039@roadrunner.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <200605171353.37745.paul.koch@statseeker.com> <20060517045403.GI1113@k7.mavetju> <20060517073919.GA169@pentarou.parodius.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3O1VwFp74L81IIeR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060517073919.GA169@pentarou.parodius.com> Subject: Re: Is it safe to compile multiple ports at the same time ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 12:27:43 -0000 --3O1VwFp74L81IIeR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > Will this solve (indirectly I presume) the following issue? If not, > not a big deal, but thought I'd ask anyways, as it's something I've > run into a couple of times: >=20 > * cd ports/A > * make > * ports/A begins building, finds dependancy on ports/X > * begins building ports/X >=20 > Then in another window/screen/whatever: >=20 > * cd ports/B > * make clean > * ports/B begins cleaning out work/ directories for all dependancies, > which includes ports/X >=20 > Back to the other window: >=20 > * ports/X stops building because you just nuked its work/ directory > * ports/A breaks due to the above That's why I set NOCLEANDEPENDS and run portsclean -C from time to time (actually, I also set 'WRKDIRPREFIX' and usually simply rm -rf WRKDIRPREFIX, this is *much* faster than 'make clean' anyway). Ulrich Spoerlein --=20 PGP Key ID: 20FEE9DD Encrypted mail welcome! Fingerprint: AEC9 AF5E 01AC 4EE1 8F70 6CBD E76E 2227 20FE E9DD Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Don't know. Don't care. --3O1VwFp74L81IIeR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEbGRA524iJyD+6d0RAjmRAJsFkj0UgFhj4QOlD55D2Gt7noaDqgCglohW 0ZvYwjwwc5x1yJEqlFcItB8= =G8hl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3O1VwFp74L81IIeR--