From owner-freebsd-ports Thu May 18 11:27:29 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA15065 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 18 May 1995 11:27:29 -0700 Received: from eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (root@eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.42.3]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA15059 for ; Thu, 18 May 1995 11:27:27 -0700 Received: from vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.142.36]) by eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP id <43080>; Thu, 18 May 1995 20:27:08 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id SAA24264; Thu, 18 May 1995 18:40:09 +0200 Message-Id: <199505181640.SAA24264@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> X-Authentication-Warning: vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Serge A. Babkin" cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pcnfsd or bwnfsd In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 18 May 1995 11:00:42 +0200." <199505180900.OAA01826@hq.icb.chel.su> Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 18:40:08 +0200 From: Julian Howard Stacey Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Bwnfsd is public domain, pcnfsd looks like freeware but I'm > not a lawyer to be shure :-) > A question is: Perhaps we need to include them in the > distribution ? Sure would be handy (always assuming we dont have this functionality already somehow) why not make a port of it ? (just look at another port for an example of how to) PS I switched this thread from hackers to ports Julian S