From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 2 10:11:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C11B67; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:11:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (mail-vc0-f169.google.com [209.85.220.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BA6781; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:11:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id kw10so228196vcb.28 for ; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 03:10:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=46V4rXKKd+rp6JEB5kpy7Bnz7V2QkXVxJAym3aWypu8=; b=naAARCTQ4pewK1YES+1ocxbqDYzvnDkrVe4yVWwmKIMo1zIQsDly5OAwToZJMsd78V mo0BUZ+ktul7MOJl0RuwEJS25yATdA5dnqDq2giXHAO72KELyy3d9w+yDnsQHZg9kaJi Mo3D+p4K10iczZNTEpG5CsBBpuekI3qyOw0KM5wr71lFCpi6An52QBuck0qdQ9mFhO5S 02GZL7kEpbsxX/UH3bQKf0IvkSTdNNrbpoipwRKFhBC8/hItRSl2eSf7/1uU0XI+pfSG RD9v/+jMb020iQgiDGjeV5YqHIBsJ0grGBWiU6oGv/698SFN8G8z4G3MY4Gb5SQzBb1N TvWA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.68.116 with SMTP id v20mr9967475vdt.126.1364897456694; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 03:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.132.203 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 03:10:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8638v9e22j.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <944760435.20130401210118@serebryakov.spb.ru> <8638v9e22j.fsf@ds4.des.no> Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 03:10:56 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: considering i386 as a tier 1 architecture From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: =?UTF-8?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Wojciech Puchar , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Lev Serebryakov , FreeBSD Hackers , Eitan Adler X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 10:11:03 -0000 On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote= : > Wojciech Puchar writes: > > Lev Serebryakov writes: > > > It is not exact so. Some Atoms on some motherboards with some > > > firmwares are 64-bit CPU. > > don't know of any now in shops that are not > > http://soekris.com/products/net5501.html > http://soekris.com/products/net6501.html > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no > I am NOT able to understand the merit of these products with respect to their features and PRICES . It is possible to assemble much more cheaper full featured PC like systems ( DDR3 memory , 64-bit capable processors , with a disadvantage about power requirements ) . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk