From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 4 19:57:11 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA17149 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 19:57:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA17135 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 19:57:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA05622; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 19:38:30 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199803050338.TAA05622@implode.root.com> To: Mike Smith cc: dmaddox@scsn.net, Evan Champion , Matthew Thyer , shimon@simon-shapiro.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: silo overflows (Was Re: 3.0-RELEASE?) In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Mar 1998 19:32:25 PST." <199803050332.TAA23822@dingo.cdrom.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 19:38:30 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> Add this to your system conf: >> >> options "MSIZE=256" > >Interesting; why change the mbuf size? Is this a recommended change >for general operation, or is 128 bytes still preferred? You don't want to do that. Without other changes, our networking code behaves poorly when MSIZE is not 128. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message