From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 13 21:19:15 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FBFF16A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:19:15 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C808E43D54
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:19:14 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from tomonage2@gmx.de)
Received: (qmail 3910 invoked by uid 65534); 13 Sep 2004 21:19:13 -0000
Received: from ca-stmnca-cuda2-blade7a-8.stmnca.adelphia.net (EHLO
	[192.168.0.10]) (68.65.223.8)
	by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 13 Sep 2004 23:19:13 +0200
X-Authenticated: #7843803
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.0.0.040405
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 14:19:35 -0700
From: Jonathan Weiss <tomonage2@gmx.de>
To: <hsn@netmag.cz>
Message-ID: <BD6B5CF7.961B%tomonage2@gmx.de>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
cc: FreeBSD-Ports <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Drop of portindex
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:19:15 -0000

Cheers,


I just noticed that portindex was removed from the ports-tree:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/71534

I just started to use portindex as an faster replacement for portsdb and I
ask myself if there are any issues with further using it.

Are there any problems with portindex or why it is dropped?


Thanks,
Jonathan