From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 08:51:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD32216A41F for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:51:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C2B43D45 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:51:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so80732wra for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 01:51:09 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MnApWeeRoJyNJepwILt16+0v3JbkekbWKTX/i/Aixntg7fzqL+Yt8E4CX6l3aguETIFCS//zVoeJ6njhBRDJw2ap3M3Jc+fgmCxZNbVRyjGasiq5rxqX5ibOkc1aBb4cDGuz8YDjkYrKMvulexlIN/rXZsnXYdtyELP9zJfhPiQ= Received: by 10.54.160.4 with SMTP id i4mr160978wre; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 01:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.56.33 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 01:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:51:09 +0400 From: Dmitry Mityugov To: Emanuel Strobl In-Reply-To: <200508310046.20808@harrymail> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200508310046.20808@harrymail> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GbE NICs besides em (recommendation wanted) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:51:10 -0000 On 8/31/05, Emanuel Strobl wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I'm quiet disappointed with the em nics and wanted to try some other > GigaBit NICs (1000baseTX only). > AFAIK there are re, sk, bge driven cards. Which doesn't saturate a PIII@8= 00 > at 200mbit/s with interrupt load (like em does)? > I heard that the re is way better than the not so well rl and although mu= ch > cheaper than em more efficient. > What about bge? Or sk? Any comments welcome, also if I missed a supported > family (TX only) I have a gigabit card managed by re and sk drivers at home IIRC (PIII@866, 2xPIII@1400). I can run some tests for you this weekend if you wish. --=20 Dmitry Mityugov, St. Petersburg, Russia I ignore all messages with confidentiality statements "We live less by imagination than despite it" - Rockwell Kent, "N by E"