From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr  2 11:23:20 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C58C106564A
	for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  2 Apr 2012 11:23:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9607C8FC0A
	for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  2 Apr 2012 11:23:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
	[212.40.38.101])
	by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id OAA23262;
	Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:23:16 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <4F798C24.60609@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:23:16 +0300
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/10.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com>
References: <201204020920.q329KCgm044092@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<CAPjTQNFkDUPWPRnt6ZdFmBgg8Oa0vo0xRYfy9nDyOOa712tm0g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPjTQNFkDUPWPRnt6ZdFmBgg8Oa0vo0xRYfy9nDyOOa712tm0g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/166568: [sched_ule] intr stuck in WAIT state
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 11:23:20 -0000

on 02/04/2012 14:06 Oliver Pinter said the following:
> You are right, this is independent from intr, while it is "always" in
> WAIT, but the load average dependend on r233599. See the attached
> graph.
> 
> The datasets are generated in single user boot ( top -s 1 -S -d 200 -m
> cpu ) , with/without r233599. Without the ule patch, the load
> decreased normally, but with r233599 it's hold to 0.5.
> ,

I am not sure what those graphs represent exactly (the legend is not informative).
 You may want to contact mav@ directly.  Maybe this is just an accounting issue,
maybe not.  I personally do not pay much attention to the load value.  CPU load is
much more useful to  me.

-- 
Andriy Gapon