From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 7 11:13:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4575037B401 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:13:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thuis.piwebs.com (217-19-20-186.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.20.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B21543F3F for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:13:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from avleeuwen@piwebs.com) Received: (qmail 12616 invoked by uid 85); 7 Aug 2003 18:13:57 -0000 Received: from avleeuwen@piwebs.com by thuis.piwebs.com by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.15 (uvscan: v4.1.60/v4234. spamassassin: 2.43. Clear:SA:0(-4.6/5.0):. Processed in 10.975401 secs); 07 Aug 2003 18:13:57 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.0.109) (192.168.0.109) by 0 with SMTP; 7 Aug 2003 18:13:45 -0000 From: Arjan van Leeuwen To: Charlie Schluting , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:12:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <20030806205057.V4316@cheshire.cat.pdx.edu> <037301c35cfe$ce51c5e0$11fd2fd8@westbend.net> <20030807110007.E38219@cheshire.cat.pdx.edu> In-Reply-To: <20030807110007.E38219@cheshire.cat.pdx.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308072012.57140.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> Subject: Re: help! 5.1 doesn't do the rc thing? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 18:13:13 -0000 On Thursday 07 August 2003 20:05, Charlie Schluting wrote: > On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: > > From: "Charlie Schluting" > > Yes, I do have that. I'm stupmed as to why the network interface didn't > start though. I think that's the reason all my stuff in > /usr/local/etc/rc.d didn't start as well, becuase they couldn't bind to > a port. Also, it didn't read rc.firewall :( > Heck, I even had to manually assign 127.0.0.1 to lo0. Strange. > > still stumped.. but I will work on it later tonight. I have another box > that I did a clean install of 5.1 on so I can compare startup scripts. Have you ran mergemaster already? It will take care of your /etc files (or at least it's supposed to). Arjan