From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 17 20:20:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDBB16A4CE; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:20:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D3A43D39; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:20:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.2.73] (cpe.125.wat.v126.packetworks.net [64.235.97.125] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7HKKZkE060465; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:20:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <412267E2.4020703@samsco.org> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:17:38 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040801 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Herve Boulouis References: <20040816190122.K30117@ra.aabs> <20040816205945.Q32601@pooker.samsco.org> <20040817100646.L30117@ra.aabs> In-Reply-To: <20040817100646.L30117@ra.aabs> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org cc: Scott Long Subject: Re: Adding a raid volume without reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:20:19 -0000 Herve Boulouis wrote: > Le 16/08/2004 à 21:01, Scott Long a écrit: > >>On FreeBSD 5.x, the /dev/aacdX entry will be created as soon as the >>controller announces it. On 4.x you might need to manually create the >>node, and that is irregardless of needing a reboot or not. >> >>So the short answer is that FreeBSD will see arrays come and go in real >>time on Adaptec RAID controllers and will do the right thing. > > > That's great news ! > > Is this behavior driver dependent or does it apply to all others raid & > scsi drivers ? > > Thanks for the info. > I can only speak for Adaptec RAID that uses the 'aac' driver. Some SCSI and SCSI-like RAID drivers will announce state changes to the SCSI layer, others don't. Scott