From owner-freebsd-ipfw Tue Oct 23 3:57: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mine.kame.net (kame195.kame.net [203.178.141.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FC437B405 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 03:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([3ffe:501:4819:1000:260:1dff:fe21:f766]) by mine.kame.net (8.11.1/3.7W) with ESMTP id f9NB93H33694; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 20:09:03 +0900 (JST) To: bvi@itouchlabs.com Cc: snap-users@kame.net, ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (KAME-snap 5578) Re: IPFW/IPSEC/NAT interaction issues with 4.4 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 23 Oct 2001 19:41:23 +0900" <20011023194123V.sakane@kame.net> References: <20011023194123V.sakane@kame.net> X-Mailer: Cue version 0.6 (010810-1737/sakane) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <20011023195704M.sakane@kame.net> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 19:57:04 +0900 From: Shoichi Sakane X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 8 Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > how was the difference of the output of "netstat" before a encrypted > packet arrived at the freebsd vpn box, and after the packet went away > somewhere ? > i have a report that "unknown/unsupported protocol" in the ipsec section of > "netstat" is counted. oops, sorry, this is not in "ipsec" section. this is "ip" section. to make sure, use "netstat -s" because other value may be counted up. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message