From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jun 1 22: 2: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F3B37B403 for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 22:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 058483198CE; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 00:02:03 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 00:02:03 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: Matthias Andree Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE delayed Message-ID: <20020602050203.GA28962@leviathan.inethouston.net> Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Andree , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200205311652.g4VGq5YV004136@intruder.bmah.org> <200205312119.g4VLJm7d008902@intruder.bmah.org> <20020601113321.GC15739@merlin.emma.line.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020601113321.GC15739@merlin.emma.line.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > deliberate malice). I get your point though, you have working tagged > > queueing on 4.5 but not on 4.6. > > I wasn't aware of a "negative" or "malicious" connotation of "black > list", I just saw it as a list that said "do not dare tagged queueing on > these chips". I thought there was an actual black list for those chipset makers who couldn't properly do TAGS or certain boards that cannot handle tags( I believe some of the old promise controllers couldn't do it properly) -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message