From owner-freebsd-security Tue Jul 30 0:48:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E460A37B400; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02.attbi.com [204.127.202.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3015243E6A; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:48:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from crist.clark@attbi.com) Received: from blossom.cjclark.org ([12.234.91.48]) by sccrmhc02.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020730074818.RDDD221.sccrmhc02.attbi.com@blossom.cjclark.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 07:48:18 +0000 Received: from blossom.cjclark.org (localhost. [127.0.0.1]) by blossom.cjclark.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6U7mHJK090064; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:48:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from crist.clark@attbi.com) Received: (from cjc@localhost) by blossom.cjclark.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6U7mDbf090063; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:48:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: blossom.cjclark.org: cjc set sender to crist.clark@attbi.com using -f Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:48:13 -0700 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: Matthew Grooms Cc: dlavigne6@cogeco.ca, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vpn1/fw1 NG to ipsec/racoon troubles, help please ... Message-ID: <20020730074813.GF89241@blossom.cjclark.org> Reply-To: "Crist J. Clark" References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [Please, -questions or -security, but not both.] On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 02:49:22PM -0500, Matthew Grooms wrote: > Ok, Im a moron. I was trying to use the gif griver whan I shouldn't > have. I've never figured out why people use gif(4) interfaces when ESP does the tunneling for you. [snip] > When the connection is initiated from the bsd side, traffic passes > through the vpn1 box, enencrypted and routed to the remote host without > a problem. Unfotunately, the response from the remote host gets caught > up on the return trip. I am guessing this is because the bsd and vpn1 > box agree on an outbound ( from the bsd boxs perspective ) proposal but > cannot agree on an inbound proposal. The checkpoint error logs say > 'encryption failure : no response from peer'. However, here is some > tcpdump output that shows bi-directional communications. Im not sure how > to interperate this. Any ideas anyone? > > tcpdump: listening on eth0 The output from running racoon(8) with the '-d' option would be much more useful. -- Crist J. Clark | cjclark@alum.mit.edu | cjclark@jhu.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | cjc@freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message