From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 7 20:19:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7F62F8D; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 20:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from btw.pki2.com (btw.pki2.com [IPv6:2001:470:a:6fd::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE4172CA8; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 20:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by btw.pki2.com (8.14.9/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s67KJJ3K063912; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 13:19:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@pki2.com) Subject: Re: Problem with vt in 268370 From: Dennis Glatting To: Ian Lepore In-Reply-To: <1404763597.65432.41.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <1404761339.76015.60.camel@btw.pki2.com> <20140707193826.GC2267@behemoth> <1404763597.65432.41.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 13:19:19 -0700 Message-ID: <1404764359.76015.63.camel@btw.pki2.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SoftwareMunitions-MailScanner-Information: Dennis Glatting X-SoftwareMunitions-MailScanner-ID: s67KJJ3K063912 X-SoftwareMunitions-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: freebsd@pki2.com Cc: Chris Nehren , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 20:19:32 -0000 On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 14:06 -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 15:38 -0400, Chris Nehren wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 12:28:59 -0700, Dennis Glatting wrote > > about a problem that the jenkins build system posted about 10 > > minutes prior to his post. > > > > You do *read* -stable@, yes? > > > > I would expect non-committers to filter out tinderbox and jenkins > emails. I certainly did before I got a commit bit, because the messages > contained no actionable information for me then. > Thank you to whoever quickly committed the fix.